# How LinkedIn ghostwriting works, step by step

What a ghostwriter does, whether it's allowed, what to ask before you hire one, and a free Claude skill that runs the same process with you.

Source page: https://postmosis.com/vault/linkedin-ghostwriting. By Leo at Postmosis. Last checked 2026-10-29. Adapted from Christian Di Bratto: [hattip-linkedin-os, a LinkedIn system for Claude](https://github.com/ChristianDiBratto25/hattip-linkedin-os), [his reel on the repo](https://www.instagram.com/reel/DfFFGpzxcEe/).

In short: A ghostwriter turns what you know into posts: an interview, a strategy, a month of ideas, a draft in your voice, then a review with one verdict [1]. Most of the job is getting the real material out of you, which is why one practitioner rule of thumb puts it at roughly 20% writing and 80% extraction [2]. Claude can run the same process if you bring the material and keep the final say.

## What a LinkedIn ghostwriter does

You already know what you'd post. The questions clients ask on calls, the mistakes you fix every month and the advice you give away for free are all post material. What's missing is the time to turn them into three posts a week, and that time is what a ghostwriter sells.

A LinkedIn ghostwriter drafts the posts you publish under your own name. The word comes from books and speeches, where a ghostwriter writes texts that are credited to another person as the author [3], and public figures have long had ghostwriters handle at least part of their social media accounts too [3].

On LinkedIn the work runs in five steps, in this order [1]:

The five steps of LinkedIn ghostwriting:

| | What happens | What you give |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The interview | The writer asks about your business, your buyer, your opinions and your proof | What your clients ask, what you'd argue about, a few posts you've written [1] |
| The strategy | Who the posts are for, the split across the funnel, and the themes | A yes, or changes, on the kind of client you want more of [1] |
| A month of ideas | Ideas with a claim, a format and the detail still needed | The figure or client story an idea is waiting on [1] |
| The draft | A short interview for the real story, a plan, then the post | Five minutes on what really happened with that client [1] |
| The review | One verdict and the fix that matters most | Your edits, then you post it from your own account [1] |

The writing is the smaller part. One practitioner rule of thumb puts ghostwriting at roughly 20% writing and 80% extraction [2]. Most of the hours go into the interview, where your real thinking comes out.

That's good news if you sell your own expertise. A coach, a consultant or an agent already has the material: the questions clients ask, the calls you take every week, the advice you repeat. A ghostwriter's job, or Claude's, is to ask for it in the right order and turn it into posts.

## Is it right for you?

Ghostwriting, by a person or by Claude, works best when a few things are already true about your week:

- Clients ask you the same few questions on every first call. That's a month of posts already.
- You'd rather talk than type. Record yourself answering the interview and paste the transcript, which the system uses in place of the questions [1].
- The people who hire you use LinkedIn at work: founders, HR leads, finance directors, other business owners.
- You can spare one short session a week to answer questions and read drafts.

It's a harder fit if you can't share any client detail at all, as some lawyers can't. Then lean on posts about your process, your opinions and the questions clients ask, which need no client named. And if you won't read drafts before they go up, don't hand the job to anyone, person or AI, because the post still carries your name [4].

## Step one: the interview

Everything starts with an interview about your business. Two to four questions at a time works better than a long form [1], because each answer shapes the next question. It should cover [1]:

- Your business and your offer.
- Your exact buyer, and what makes them decide to buy [1].
- Their problems, the outcome they want, and the objections they raise before they say yes.
- What makes you different.
- Your background, your real opinions and your experience. Include the parts of your field you'd argue about.
- Proof you can share: results, clients and numbers you're allowed to use [1].
- What you want from LinkedIn.
- How often you can post, and whether you can film, photograph or design anything yourself.
- Two or three things you've written, for your voice [1].
- Topics to avoid [1].

The hardest question is what makes you different. Answer it with facts a competitor couldn't copy: the kind of client you've worked with most, the method you use every time, the work you turn down. Every coach says they care about their clients, so that line can't set you apart.

Example: A family lawyer's answer: "I only take cases where both parents still have to co-parent, I settle most of them without going to court, and I won't take a case where a parent wants to use the children to win money." That gives the writer three buckets and one opinion to post about.

Save time by pasting in your website copy, your notes or a call transcript. If Claude says it read your website, check that it really opened the page [1].

The interview prompt:

```
You're the editor and strategist for my LinkedIn. I'm a [coach / consultant / real estate agent / freelancer / lawyer] and my clients are [who].

Interview me about my business before you suggest anything. Ask two to four questions at a time and follow up when I'm vague.

Cover: my offer; my exact buyer and what makes them decide to buy; their problems, the outcome they want and their objections; what makes me different; my background and real opinions; proof I'm allowed to share; my goals for LinkedIn; how often I can post and what media I can make; topics to avoid. Ask me to paste two or three things I've written.

Don't claim you read my website unless you opened it. Don't invent anything I haven't told you.

When we're done, write an onboarding document with the headings below, show me a short summary, list the open questions and ask me to confirm it's right.
```

Template: the onboarding document:

```
ONBOARDING
Business and offer:
Exact buyer and what makes them buy:
Their problems, outcomes and objections:
What makes me different:
My background, beliefs and experience:
Proof I can share:
Goals and signs of success:
Voice notes:
How often I post, media I can make, limits:
Topics to avoid:
Open questions:
```

These headings follow the system's own onboarding document [1]. Confirm it before moving on, because every later step reads it.

Example: A career coach's onboarding, in short. Offer: six sessions for mid-career managers who want a new role. Buyer: managers who've been passed over for promotion once. What makes them buy: a second rejection, or a new boss. Objection: "I can job hunt on my own." Proof: three clients agreed to be named. Topics to avoid: their current employers.

## Step two: the strategy

From the onboarding document, ask for a strategy and approve it before any posts get written [5]. The strategy sets the split across the funnel, 40% top, 40% middle and 20% bottom by default [1], and three or four themes, called buckets, for each stage [6].

Every bucket needs your real expertise behind it [6]. A property agent who has never sold a commercial unit shouldn't have a commercial bucket, however popular the topic is.

Template: the strategy document:

```
LINKEDIN STRATEGY
Buyer and positioning:
The business result I want:
How a reader moves from stranger to client, and the funnel split:
Top of funnel: 3 to 4 buckets
Middle of funnel: 3 to 4 buckets
Bottom of funnel: 3 to 4 buckets
Writing rules and voice:
How often I post, and the media I can make:
How I'll measure progress:
What not to write:
```

The headings match the system's strategy template [7]. For the deeper version, with the three files the AI reads before every draft and a table for tracking replies, see the [LinkedIn content strategy](https://postmosis.com/vault/linkedin-content-strategy).

## Step three: a month of ideas

With the strategy approved, ask for twenty distinct ideas, each with a claim, a stage, a bucket, a format and the detail you'd still need to give [8]. Ideas that rest on something you haven't checked get marked and wait [8].

Then the calendar. Put only as many ideas on dates as you'll really post, and keep roughly the 40/40/20 split across the month [8]. On three posts a week that's about a dozen dated posts, with the rest held for next month.

Example: A career coach's first month, top to bottom. Week one is why she stopped telling clients to apply for everything (top), her three-line self-review method (middle) and what a first session covers (bottom). Week two opens with a reaction to a hiring-freeze headline and a post on how to ask for a pay review. The other weeks follow the same mix, and one client result waits until the client says yes.

Each idea also gets a format. The system works from nine that suit LinkedIn: a strategic tag, an industry prediction, a teardown of a well-known name, a tech stack, a named method, a screenshot of a post, a news headline, a bad tactic callout and "if I were you" [9]. Pick the idea first; a format never rescues a weak one [1].

The idea card, the month-of-ideas prompt, all nine formats with an example for your work, and a long list of ideas for coaches, consultants, agents, freelancers and lawyers are in [LinkedIn post ideas](https://postmosis.com/vault/linkedin-post-ideas).

## Step four: a draft in your voice

Before drafting, the writer asks what real experience backs the idea. That's a short source interview of three to five questions, or a transcript if you have one [1].

Then the post gets a plan with four parts, called CPIO: Convey, Package, Information and Order [10]. Each part is settled before any drafting [10].

The CPIO plan:

| | What you decide |
| --- | --- |
| Convey | One sentence on what the post must get across, and the result you want from it, such as trust or a booked call. If it takes two sentences, go back to the source [10] |
| Package | The format, the angle, and what the hook leads with and holds back for the body [10] |
| Information | The facts and stories the post needs, what to leave out, and what's still missing [10] |
| Order | Hook, setup, development, support where the evidence goes, then an ending that finishes the idea [1] |

The source interview and CPIO prompt:

```
Here's the idea for my next LinkedIn post: [paste the idea card]

First, ask me three to five questions about the real experience behind it. Wait for my answers.

Then write a CPIO plan:
Convey: one sentence on what the post must get across, and the result I want from it.
Package: the format, the angle, and what the hook leads with and holds back.
Information: the facts and stories from my answers that the post needs, what to leave out, and what's missing. Write "None" if nothing is.
Order: hook, setup, development, support, ending.

Show me the plan and wait for my yes before you draft.

Then draft only from what I told you. Plain words, short sentences, short paragraphs. Keep my level of certainty. No bold text, no rhetorical questions, no closing summary, and no call to action unless the plan says so. Don't add figures, clients or credentials I didn't give you.
```

The draft should come only from what you said [1], and it should keep your actual level of certainty [1]. A post that makes you sound more sure, or more successful, than you are is the fastest way to lose a reader who knows the field.

Example: A consultant's CPIO plan. Convey: owners lose weeks waiting on one approval, and I want them to see me as the person who finds it. Package: a short story that opens on the client's email. Information: the client waited on a signature for most of a quarter; leave out the name and the industry; missing: nothing. Order: the email, what it was waiting on, how we found it, the one change, what the reader should check in their own business.

Hold every draft, idea and review to the same standard [5]. Lead with the point [5]. Write for a reader who's never heard of you, keep it as short as its job allows, and don't tack a sales pitch onto the end [5]. The [LinkedIn post best practices checklist](https://postmosis.com/vault/linkedin-post-best-practices) has the twelve checks and the list of phrases to cut.

Your voice comes from the two or three things you wrote in the interview [1]. If the drafts still sound like a machine, [how to make AI writing sound human](https://postmosis.com/vault/make-ai-writing-sound-human) builds a voice file from your own posts and has a cleanup prompt.

## Step five: the review

Every draft gets one verdict before it goes up. Judge the idea and the packaging first, and only then the sentences [11].

The three verdicts:

| | What it means | What happens next |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PASS | Ready, maybe light polish | Post it [1] |
| REVISE | The idea is sound and the execution has problems | Fix the highest-impact issue first [1] |
| RETHINK | The idea is weak or the packaging is wrong, and line edits won't fix it | Go back to the idea card [1] |

A review gives up to three reasons, keeps the words and tone that work, and never adds credentials, figures or stories you didn't give [1]. If a fact is missing, it asks or marks the gap [11].

The review prompt:

```
Review this LinkedIn post draft.

First name the claim, the reader, what it's based on and its purpose. Judge the idea and the packaging before the sentences.

Give one verdict: PASS (ready, light polish at most), REVISE (sound idea, execution problems) or RETHINK (weak idea or wrong packaging).

Then fill in:
Central idea and audience:
Highest-impact issue:
Next fixes (up to three):
Specific edits or the rewritten post:
Evidence or media needed:

Keep my words where they work. Don't add credentials, figures or stories I didn't give you. If a fact is missing, mark the gap.

Draft: [paste]
```

The fields come from the system's review template [12]. Here's what a REVISE looks like on a real kind of draft:

Example: Draft opening: "I've been thinking a lot about client communication lately." Verdict: REVISE. Highest-impact issue: the story is in paragraph four. A client emailed on a Friday night asking why nothing had moved in a month. Fix: open on that email. New first line: "A client emailed me at 9pm on a Friday: why hasn't anything moved since March?"

Example: The same consultant's post after the fix: "A client emailed me at 9pm on a Friday: why hasn't anything moved since March?" "We traced it in an hour. Every supplier invoice over a set amount waited for one director's signature, and she was on leave." "The fix took one line in their approval rules: a second signer." "If your team waits on one person for sign-off, check what happens when that person is away." Second review: PASS.

Watch which edits you keep making. If you rewrite every hook and leave the body alone, that tells your writer something about your voice [2], so add it to your voice notes.

## A week of ghostwriting yourself

Once the strategy is approved, the steps fit around client work. Here's one week on three posts:

A week of running it yourself:

| | What you do | What you tell Claude |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Monday | The weekly check-in, between calls | Interview me about last week. Then give me new ideas.  |
| Tuesday | Pick Thursday's idea and answer the source interview | Interview me for this idea, then show me the CPIO plan.  |
| Wednesday | Read the draft aloud, run the review, fix the one issue | Review this post.  |
| Thursday | Post it from your own account, and reply to comments that day | Nothing. This part is yours.  |
| Friday | Note any enquiry or booked call next to the post | Add this to my notes for the monthly review.  |

Monday's check-in should ask about client conversations, surprising requests, decisions, wins, failures, changed opinions and methods, and give you five to eight new ideas [1]. The other two posts that week come off the calendar you already approved.

Example: A career coach's Monday answers: two clients asked how to bring up pay in a review, and one got the job after rewriting the first line of her cover letter. She also changed her mind about telling clients to apply widely. Three ideas. The second waits until the client agrees to be mentioned.

## Run it in Claude

If you'd rather keep every word in your own hands, run the system yourself. Hat Tip LinkedIn OS is a free, MIT-licensed system that runs all five steps inside the Claude app, with no install and no code [13]. You set it up once and then open it whenever you sit down to plan or write. There are two ways in.

The quick way: open a new chat in Claude and paste this line. Web search needs to be on, and it is by default [13].

The quick start line:

```
Read https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ChristianDiBratto25/hattip-linkedin-os/main/START.md and run it with me.
```

It explains how it works in two or three sentences and asks the first interview questions in the same reply, without waiting for permission [1]. Have your last few client enquiries open when you start, because they answer half its questions. To pick up later, paste the same line into a new chat along with the documents it gave you [13]. It reads them, confirms in one line where you left off and asks what you want to do next [1].

If you only want one post written or reviewed, say so, and it helps with that and skips the rest [1]. That's the quickest way to try it on a draft you already have.

The weekly way: install it as a skill, which takes about two minutes [13], so you only type "Start my LinkedIn strategy" in any chat [13].

1. Download hattip-linkedin-os.zip from the repo, and don't unzip it [13].
2. In Claude, open Settings, then Capabilities, and switch on Code execution and file creation [13].
3. Open Customize, then Skills, click the plus button, then Create skill and Upload a skill, and pick the zip [13].
4. Open a new chat and type: Start my LinkedIn strategy.

It works on Claude Free, Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise, on the web and desktop apps. On Team and Enterprise, your admin may need to allow custom skills [13].

Work inside a Claude Project, for example one called My LinkedIn, and add each file it gives you to the project's files [13]. Chats don't remember each other [1], so the project files are how next week's chat knows your strategy. The files it hands you are the onboarding, the strategy, the idea bank and calendar, each post draft, weekly notes and a performance review [1].

Once it's set up, ask for one job at a time [13]. Plan my next month. Interview me for post 4. Review this post. Find timely topics for my buyer, or review my performance CSV when the month is over.

Your answers stay in your own Claude account, and nothing is sent to the people who made it [13]. Don't want a skill at all? The interview, CPIO and review prompts run the same steps in any chat, in Claude or ChatGPT.

Postmosis gives each brand a private link you add to Claude as a connector, so Claude reads your posts, calendar and brand kit and saves drafts back to Postmosis for you to check. [See Claude in Postmosis](https://postmosis.com/features/claude)

## Keep it going every week

A ghostwriter checks in every week, and so should your Claude chat. Three jobs keep it going.

The weekly check-in asks about client conversations, surprising requests, decisions, wins, failures, opinions you changed and methods you used, and turns the answers into five to eight new ideas [1]. The prompt is in [LinkedIn post ideas](https://postmosis.com/vault/linkedin-post-ideas).

Timely topics need web search: recent primary sources with dates, turned into a few angles for your buyer. If Claude can't search, it should say so and work from links you give it [14].

The monthly review reads your numbers. Export a CSV with each post's date, text, link, impressions and engagement, plus any business result like an enquiry [1]. Ask for patterns, the sample size and the limits, and don't let it claim causes it can't measure [1]. Your LinkedIn post analytics show discovery, profile activity and social engagement for each post, and only you can see them [15].

The monthly review prompt:

```
Here's a CSV of my LinkedIn posts from the last month: date, post text, link, impressions, engagement, and any enquiry or booked call I can tie to a post.

Tell me how many posts this is and what that sample can and can't show. Point out any outliers.

Group the results by funnel stage, bucket, format and media, but only where the grouping is fair. Don't claim a cause you can't measure.

Suggest up to three changes for next month. Keep my approved strategy unless I agree to change it.

[paste CSV]
```

Keep the approved strategy until you agree to change it [5]. One quiet month on a handful of posts is too small a sample to throw a plan away.

## Is LinkedIn ghostwriting allowed?

Yes, with two conditions: you post from your own account, and every claim in the post is true. For a coach, an agent or a lawyer, the real question is what you're putting your name to.

LinkedIn's user agreement says you'll have one account in your real name [16] and that you won't share it with anyone else [16]. It also rules out using another person's account, for example by sharing log-in details [16]. So the writer drafts and you post. A writer who asks for your password is asking you to break the agreement.

The same agreement rules out bots and other automated ways to comment, like, share or otherwise drive inauthentic engagement [16]. Any service that offers to boost your posts with automated likes or comments is selling you that risk.

LinkedIn also says you're responsible for everything you post, and that your posts should represent your professional identity and expertise [4]. If you've relied heavily on AI to make a post, it recommends letting people know when that isn't obvious from the context [4].

Some professions add their own rules. In the United States, the American Bar Association's model rule says a lawyer shall not make a false or misleading communication about the lawyer or their services [17]. A post someone else drafted is still your communication, so read every line as if you'd typed it, and check your own professional body's rules on advertising before you hand the job to anyone.

The risky lines are usually the specific ones. For a coach that's a client story, which needs permission even with the name changed, and for an agent it's a sale price you aren't allowed to share yet. A consultant's risk is a client's own figure. A ghostwriter can't know which of those you've cleared, so you check them in every review.

Whether you tell people is your call. Book ghostwriters are sometimes asked to sign a nondisclosure contract that keeps their role quiet [3]. On LinkedIn the simpler test is this: would you say every line of the post to a client on a call? If you would, it's yours, whoever typed it.

## Hire a ghostwriter or run it yourself

Both routes run the same five steps. The difference is who asks the questions and who does the typing.

A ghostwriter or Claude:

| | Hire a ghostwriter | Run it in Claude |
| --- | --- | --- |
| What you give | Interview time, approvals, the stories behind posts | The same, plus the time to read and edit each draft  |
| What you get | Finished drafts and someone who chases you for material | Drafts in minutes, whenever you sit down to do it  |
| Where it goes wrong | A writer who skips the interview and posts generic advice in your name | You skip the interview, so the drafts come out generic  |
| Best for | Your diary is full of client work and you have the budget | You can spare a short session a week and want every word to be yours  |

Rates depend on how many posts you get, how much strategy is included and whether you hire one writer or a firm [2]. Compare quotes on those three things, plus the number of review rounds. If you bill by the hour, set the fee against the hours you'd spend each week doing it yourself.

If you hire, ask these before you sign:

- How do you interview me, and how often after the first month?
- Who posts, and do you need my login? You shouldn't need it [16].
- How many review rounds before a post goes up?
- What will you never invent? The answer should include results, figures, client stories and quotes.
- Who owns the drafts and the strategy if we stop working together?
- What do you report, and what counts as a good month?
- Do you write for anyone who competes with me?

Walk away from anyone who guarantees follower or reach numbers, offers automated engagement, or wants to start writing before they've interviewed you.

## When it won't work for you

Know the limits before you start, whichever route you pick.

- It doesn't post to LinkedIn or connect to your account [13], so you copy each approved post and post it yourself.
- It won't invent stats, client stories or quotes [13]. A draft is only as strong as what you tell it.
- It promises no reach, engagement or leads [13], and a post with big engagement can still bring you no clients at all [1].

The method fails in three predictable ways. You skip the interview, so the drafts come out sounding like anyone in your field. You approve drafts without reading them, so a claim you can't back ends up under your name. Or your buyers aren't on LinkedIn at all: a life coach whose clients are parents may do better putting the same posts where those parents scroll, and keeping LinkedIn for referrers.

When it fails, go back one step. Generic drafts usually mean the interview was thin, so run the source interview again and bring one real client story to it. If you get RETHINK after RETHINK, the ideas are the problem. Redo the weekly check-in before you draft anything else.

## Common questions

### What does a LinkedIn ghostwriter do?

They interview you, write a strategy you approve, plan a month of post ideas, draft each post from what you told them and review it before you post [1]. You still post from your own account and have the final say on every line.

### Is having a ghostwriter illegal?

No. Ghostwriters write texts credited to someone else, and public figures use them for social media accounts [3]. On LinkedIn, post from your own account, which the user agreement says you won't share [16], and make sure every claim is true.

### How much does a LinkedIn ghostwriter cost?

It depends on how many posts you get, how much strategy is included and whether you hire one writer or a firm [2]. Compare quotes on the monthly post count, the review rounds and who posts, and ask what they'll never invent.

### How do I ghostwrite LinkedIn posts with Claude?

Paste the Hat Tip LinkedIn OS start line into a new Claude chat, or install it as a skill and type Start my LinkedIn strategy [13]. It interviews you, builds a strategy, plans ideas, drafts and reviews. Or paste the interview, CPIO and review prompts into any chat.

### Can Claude write LinkedIn posts in my voice?

It gets close when you give it two or three things you've written and real stories to work from [1]. LinkedIn says AI can help refine language, but content should still reflect your own voice, perspective and experience [4].

### What is the 4+1 rule on LinkedIn?

It usually means the 4-1-1 rule from LinkedIn's company page tips: for every post about you with a call to action, share one post pointing to another source and four posts by other people [18]. Read it as: most posts help, few ask.

### How do I turn on ghost mode on LinkedIn?

LinkedIn calls it private mode. Click Me, then Settings & Privacy, then Visibility, then Visibility when viewing other profiles, and pick private mode [19]. On a free account you then can't see who viewed your own profile [19].

## Sources

1. [Hat Tip LinkedIn OS START.md, Christian Di Bratto (GitHub)](https://github.com/ChristianDiBratto25/hattip-linkedin-os/blob/main/START.md), read 2026-10-29
2. [LinkedIn ghostwriting: how to build and scale, MagicPost](https://magicpost.in/blog/linkedin-ghostwriting), read 2026-10-29
3. [Ghostwriter, Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghostwriter), read 2026-10-29
4. [Best practices for content created with the help of AI, LinkedIn Help](https://www.linkedin.com/help/linkedin/answer/a1481496), read 2026-10-29
5. [Hat Tip LinkedIn OS skill file, Christian Di Bratto (GitHub)](https://github.com/ChristianDiBratto25/hattip-linkedin-os/blob/main/hattip-linkedin-os/SKILL.md), read 2026-10-29
6. [Hat Tip funnel strategy, Christian Di Bratto (GitHub)](https://github.com/ChristianDiBratto25/hattip-linkedin-os/blob/main/hattip-linkedin-os/knowledge/funnel-strategy.md), read 2026-10-29
7. [Hat Tip strategy template, Christian Di Bratto (GitHub)](https://github.com/ChristianDiBratto25/hattip-linkedin-os/blob/main/hattip-linkedin-os/templates/strategy.md), read 2026-10-29
8. [Hat Tip ideas workflow, Christian Di Bratto (GitHub)](https://github.com/ChristianDiBratto25/hattip-linkedin-os/blob/main/hattip-linkedin-os/workflows/ideas.md), read 2026-10-29
9. [Hat Tip LinkedIn methods, Christian Di Bratto (GitHub)](https://github.com/ChristianDiBratto25/hattip-linkedin-os/blob/main/hattip-linkedin-os/knowledge/linkedin-methods.md), read 2026-10-29
10. [Hat Tip CPIO writing framework, Christian Di Bratto (GitHub)](https://github.com/ChristianDiBratto25/hattip-linkedin-os/blob/main/hattip-linkedin-os/knowledge/cpio-framework.md), read 2026-10-29
11. [Hat Tip review workflow, Christian Di Bratto (GitHub)](https://github.com/ChristianDiBratto25/hattip-linkedin-os/blob/main/hattip-linkedin-os/workflows/review.md), read 2026-10-29
12. [Hat Tip post review template, Christian Di Bratto (GitHub)](https://github.com/ChristianDiBratto25/hattip-linkedin-os/blob/main/hattip-linkedin-os/templates/post-review.md), read 2026-10-29
13. [Hat Tip LinkedIn OS README, Christian Di Bratto (GitHub)](https://github.com/ChristianDiBratto25/hattip-linkedin-os), read 2026-10-29
14. [Hat Tip research workflow, Christian Di Bratto (GitHub)](https://github.com/ChristianDiBratto25/hattip-linkedin-os/blob/main/hattip-linkedin-os/workflows/research.md), read 2026-10-29
15. [View post analytics for your content, LinkedIn Help](https://www.linkedin.com/help/linkedin/answer/a525196), read 2026-10-29
16. [User Agreement, LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/legal/user-agreement), read 2026-10-29
17. [Rule 7.1: Communications concerning a lawyer's services, American Bar Association](https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_7_1_communication_concerning_a_lawyer_s_services/), read 2026-10-29
18. [LinkedIn's top 10 tips on improving your company page, Story Jungle](https://en.storyjungle.io/linkedin-news/linkedin-s-top-10-tips-on-improving-your-company-page_a-283-6861.html), read 2026-10-29
19. [Browse profiles in private and semi-private mode, LinkedIn Help](https://www.linkedin.com/help/linkedin/answer/a567226), read 2026-10-29